General Cases
Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Smith v. Quarterman
as 08-20830
Petitioner - Appellant: RODNEY WAYNE SMITH
Respondent - Appellee: NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Smith v. Quarterman
as 08-20755
Petitioner - Appellant: RODNEY WAYNE SMITH
Respondent - Appellee: NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Gary Wayne Smith v. Larry Small
as 5:2008cv01457
Petitioner: Gary Wayne Smith
Respondent: Larry Small
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Quarterman We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2008cv00855
Petitioner: Rodney Wayne Smith
Respondent: Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH v. MCNEIL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2008cv00040
Petitioner: DEXTER WAYNE SMITH
Respondent: WALTER MCNEIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Yates We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2008cv00007
Petitioner: Timothy Wayne Smith
Respondent: James Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Beck We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-7455
Petitioner - Appellant: ROBERT WAYNE SMITH
Respondent - Appellee: THEODIS BECK, Secretary of the Department of Corrections
Smith #520383 v. Palmer We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv01018
Petitioner: Steven Wayne Smith #520383
Respondent: Carmen Palmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith et al
as 1:2007cv00313
Petitioner: Curtis Wayne Smith
Respondent: Brad Livingston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?