Cases 1 - 10 of 81
Williams v. Rankins, Woods
as 1:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Wendy Williams
Defendant:
Sylvia Rankins, Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Vaughn v. Maness et al
as 5:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Clarence Vaughn
Defendant:
Blake Maness, John Michael Hill, David Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00603
Plaintiff:
Wendy Williams
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Clark v. Williams et al
as 2:2023cv04201
Plaintiff:
April Clark
Defendant:
Wendy Williams and Southeast Mental Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Williams v. City of Birmingham et al
as 2:2023cv01742
Plaintiff:
Wendie Williams
Defendant:
City of Birmingham, Joshua Yates, Danita Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Council v. Hamm et al
as 2:2023cv00658
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Council
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections Commissioner, John Q. Hamm, Wendy Williams and others
Petitioner:
Arnaldo Mercado, Dustin Brewer and Steven Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crafton v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Crafton
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, John Q. Hamm, Wendy Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. WKRG 5
as 1:2023cv00348
Plaintiff:
Wendy Williams
Defendant:
WKRG 5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Williams v. Mitchell Grocery Corp
as 2:2023cv01179
Plaintiff:
Wendy Williams
Defendant:
Mitchell Grocery Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Williams v. Darrington, et al
as 1:2023cv00308
Plaintiff:
Wendy Williams
Defendant:
Linda Darrington and Husband
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
