Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3066
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gooch v. Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation et al
as 4:2023cv00113
Plaintiff:
Christopher N. Gooch
Defendant:
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation, Wabtec Components LLC and Shuttlewagon Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00371
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00560
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00444
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01601
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00427
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mediator:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Robinson v. Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation et al
as 3:2009cv00202
Plaintiff:
Alama A. Robinson
Defendant:
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation and WABTEC Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv00688
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
