Cases 1 - 8 of 8
CONKLIN v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2019cv22225
Defendant:
MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION, ASTRAZENECA LP and ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CONKLIN
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Conklin et al v. Nationwide Property and Casualty Insurance Company et al
as 2:2016cv00081
Plaintiff:
William Conklin, III and Beth Conklin
Defendant:
Nationwide Property and Casualty Insurance Company and Patricia L. Palmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Conklin et al v. Nationwide Property and Casualty Insurance Company et al
as 2:2016cv08604
Plaintiff:
William Conklin, III and Beth Conklin
Defendant:
Nationwide Property and Casualty Insurance Company and Patricia L. Palmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Conklin v. Jefferson County Board of Education et al
as 3:2016cv00008
Plaintiff:
William Conklin
Defendant:
Jefferson County Board of Education, Howard Guth and Terry Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCKINNIE v. FERRARO et al
as 2:2015cv00452
Plaintiff:
DERECK MCKINNIE
Defendant:
SUSAN FERRARO, HOBOKEN MUNICIPAL PROSECUTOR OFFICE, HOBOKEN MUNICIPAL COURT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barrone et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2008cv03413
Plaintiff:
Ronald Barrone, Christopher Barone, William Conklin and others
Defendant:
City of New York, New York City Police Department, Sidney Valerio and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CONKLIN v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2008cv03069
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CONKLIN and WILLIAM CONKLIN
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Conklin v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as 4:2008cv01528
Plaintiff:
William Conklin and William Conklin
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
