Cases 1 - 10 of 118
Son Vuong v. William Hall, Jr., et al
as 23-13737
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SON THI VUONG
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM DEAN HALL, JR., JOSHUA C. CANTON, TERRY P. LEWIS and others
Johnson v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv04151
Plaintiff:
William Dean Johnson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
VUONG v. HALL et al
as 4:2023cv00327
Plaintiff:
SON THI VUONG
Defendant:
WILLIAM DEAN HALL, JR, JOSHUA C CANTON, TERRY P LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McPherson v. Look Entertainment Ltd et al
as 2:2023cv04273
Plaintiff:
Angelique McPherson
Defendant:
Look Entertainment d/b/a Billy Dean's Showtime Caf, William Dean, Rori Gordon and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Quilter v. Betts et al
as 1:2023cv00170
Plaintiff:
Gidget Chairmaine Quilter and Gidget Quilter
Defendant:
Director Cathy Betts, Raymond Nishimiya, C. J. Ibara and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Meridian Security Insurance Company v. Conte et al
as 4:2022cv01062
Plaintiff:
Meridian Security Insurance Company
Defendant:
Lacy J. Conte, Stephen L. Graham, William Dean Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Blanton v. Colbert
as 1:2022cv00330
Plaintiff:
David William Dean Blanton
Defendant:
Colbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCormick v. Oregon Employment Dept.
as 6:2022cv01464
Plaintiff:
William Dean McCormick
Defendant:
Oregon Employment Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blanton v. Tim
as 1:2022cv00309
Plaintiff:
David William Dean Blanton
Defendant:
Tim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blanton v. Tim et al
as 1:2022cv00298
Plaintiff:
David William Dean Blanton
Defendant:
Tim and Elijah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
