Cases 31 - 40 of 58
NORDQUIST v. EDDINS et al
as 3:2020cv05800
Defendant:
LAWRENCE KEEFE, JOHN MILLER and WILLIAM EDDINS
Plaintiff:
ERIC NORDQUIST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRYSTAL v. PORSCHE OF DESTIN et al
as 3:2020cv05579
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL GROUP INC and JEFFERY T CRYSTAL
Defendant:
PORSCHE OF DESTIN, OKALOOSA STATE ATTORNEY, OKALOOSA CRIMINAL COURTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ardis v. Dickey et al
as 3:2020cv01335
Defendant:
Sarah Harper-Crutchfield, Timothy Register, William Eddins and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Michael Ardis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PALMGREN v. DONOVAN et al
as 3:2019cv00080
Defendant:
WENDELL HALL, WILLIAM BLAKE WEEKLEY, OFFICE OF THE STATE ATTORNEY OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA and others
Plaintiff:
CLAYTON PALMGREN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Ardis v. Gary Bergosh, et al
as 18-12745
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT MICHAEL ARDIS
Defendant - Appellee:
PAM CHILDERS, GARY BERGOSH, LAURA DANHEISSER and others
ARDIS v. BERGOSH, et al
as 3:2018cv01273
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MICHAEL ARDIS
Defendant:
GARY BERGOSH, PAMELA CHILDERS, LAURA DANHEISSER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RIBBING v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 3:2018cv00412
Plaintiff:
PATRICK ANTHONY RIBBING
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, WILLIAM EDDINS, LYLEE DODSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LANIER v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 3:2017cv00312
Plaintiff:
WILLIE B LANIER
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, CLERRA BURNS and WILLIAM EDDINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Eddins et al
as 1:2017cv00105
Plaintiff:
Justin M White
Defendant:
William Eddins , Caddell Construction Co. (DE), LLC and John and/or Jane Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCKENNA v. NOBLES et al
as 3:2017cv00179
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM SCOTT MCKENNA
Defendant:
LINDA NOBLES, JOHN DOE NOBLES, WILLIAM EDDINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
