Cases 1 - 10 of 41
GONZALEZ v. WARDEN FCI MCKEAN et al
as 1:2024cv00022
Petitioner:
WILLIAM GONZALEZ
Respondent:
WARDEN FCI MCKEAN and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Staton v. Gonzalez
as 23-378
Plaintiff:
S.S.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Terrell Staton
Defendant / Appellee:
William Gonzalez, 191111429 (Link 313048), Joan Shriver, Larissa Howard and others
Staton et al v. Shriver et al
as 3:2022cv00860
Plaintiff:
Terrell Staton, Skylar Staton and S. S.
Defendant:
Joan Shriver, Larissa Howard, William Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Staton et al v. Gonzalez et al
as 3:2022cv00861
Plaintiff:
Terrell Staton, Skylar Staton and S. S.
Defendant:
William Gonzalez, Joan Shriver, Larissa Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saunders v. Campbell et al
as 5:2022cv00029
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Saunders
Defendant:
Levi Campbell, Dr. Bejamin Leeah, William Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 7:2020cv00025
Defendant:
William Gonzalez, L Dody, R Chavez and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Randolph Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melendez-Vidaurre v. Gonzalez-Cebollero
as 3:2018cv01947
Plaintiff:
Gildo Julio Melendez-Vidaurre
Defendant:
William Gonzalez-Cebollero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timothy Wallace v. Ken Paxton, et al
as 18-20445
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY RANDOLPH WALLACE
Defendant - Appellee:
KEN PAXTON, BRAD LIVINGSTON, LEON GUINN and others
Gonzalez v. United States of America
as 0:2018cv60045
Plaintiff:
William Gonzalez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Wallace v. Paxton et al
as 4:2016cv02827
Plaintiff:
Timothy Randolph Wallace
Defendant:
Ken Paxton, Brad Livingston, Leon Guinn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
