Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Mellott v. DiCiolla et al
as 3:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
William Howard Mellott, II
Defendant:
Magistrate Ronald J. DiCiolla and State's Attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv23289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
William Labonte v. Robert Colville
as 22-1802
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM HOWARD LABONTE and WILLIAM LABONTE
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT J. COLVILLE
William Labonte v. Malik Cutlar
as 22-1774
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM HOWARD LABONTE and WILLIAM LABONTE
Defendant / Appellee:
MALIK CUTLAR
William Labonte v. Christy Wiegand
as 22-1622
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM HOWARD LABONTE and WILLIAM LABONTE
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTY C. WIEGAND, Public Official, individual capacity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01700
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
William Labonte v. Donetta Ambrose, et al
as 22-1514
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM HOWARD LABONTE and WILLIAM LABONTE
Defendant / Appellee:
DONETTA W. AMBROSE, EMPLOYEE OF DISTRICT COURTS WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA and MARLA D. TORTORICE, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE W. DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
LABONTE v. WIEGAND
as 2:2022cv00343
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HOWARD LABONTE
Defendant:
CRISTY CRISWELL WIEGAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clervrain et al v. Madden et al
as 5:2022cv00004
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Ronaldo Jean, Brandko, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Madden, Jon Husted, Dave Yost and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LABONTE v. WILSON et al
as 2:2021cv00774
Defendant:
DEBORH LONG, SHAWN WILSON and DEBORAH I WILSON
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HOWARD LABONTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
