Cases 1 - 10 of 593
Walsh et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv04680
Plaintiff:
William Watts, Barry Watson, Joseph Walters and others
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
United States v. Forbis
as 24-5097
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
WILLIAM JAMES FORBIS
Walsh et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv06009
Plaintiff:
Emily Weaver, Jesse Watson, Joseph Walters and others
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Ray v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00654
Petitioner:
William James Ray
Respondent:
Warden
Unknown:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Gradford v. Warden, California Department of Corrections
as 1:2024cv00761
Plaintiff:
William James Gradford, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden, California Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pons v. National Football League et al
as 1:2024cv04979
Defendant:
New York Jets, LLC, National Football League and NFL Properties, LLC
Plaintiff:
William James Pons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
(PC) Gradford v. Warden
as 2:2024cv01841
Defendant:
Warden
Plaintiff:
William James Gradford, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams James, et al. v. Bank of America, National Association, et al.
as 24-3870
Plaintiff:
MARIA WILLIAMS JAMES, NATHAN EARL AIWOHI, TOBY ALAMOANA KEOHOKAPU and others
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
Ford v. Strada et al
as 1:2024cv01134
Plaintiff:
William James Ford
Defendant:
Frank Strada, Brandon Watwood, Lisa Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
