Cases 1 - 10 of 86
USA v. William Siefert
as 24-5384
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
WILLIAM LAWRENCE SIEFERT, MD
Pringle v. Caner, M.D.
as 4:2023cv10118
Plaintiff:
William Lawrence Pringle
Defendant:
Dr. Raul Caner, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawrence v. Newman et al
as 1:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
William Lawrence
Defendant:
Magistrate Edward Newman, Department of Human Services of Rhode Island and Child Support Services of RI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States of America v. Billow
as 24-218
Defendant / Appellant:
WILLIAM LAWRENCE BILLOW and William Lawrence Billows
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01979
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv05839
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Summitt et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv02838
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott Summitt, James C Smith, Charles Wesley Smith, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
Summitt et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00682
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott Summitt, James C Smith, Charles Wesley Smith, III and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
PEDERSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv07373
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LAWRENCE PEDERSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BROWN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv18754
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LAWRENCE BROWN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
