Cases 1 - 10 of 16
PRYOR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv25067
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM PRYOR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Simon v. DeSantis et al
as 0:2023cv60245
Plaintiff:
Chrisnel Simon
Defendant:
Governor Ron DeSantis, Casey DeSantis, State Attorney Harold F. Pryor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00751
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
PRYOR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv63186
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM PRYOR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Watson v. Bloom et al
as 0:2021cv60192
Defendant:
Judge Peter T. Fay, Jill Pryor, William Pryor and others
Plaintiff:
Todd E. Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodson v. Strozier et al
as 1:2017cv22110
Defendant:
Marc W. Morris, Micheal J. Strozier, Katherine Fernandez-Rundle and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Damarcus Woodson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Pryor v. Penzone et al
as 2:2017cv01276
Plaintiff:
Brian William Pryor
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Jeffrey J Alvarez, Paul Hilmo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ware v. Hawthorn et al
as 1:2016cv00489
Petitioner:
Ulysses T Ware
Respondent:
Zack J Hawthorn, Marcia A Crone, David A O'Toole and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Kamdar et al v. Cyclebar Franchising, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv02704
Plaintiff:
Tejal Kamdar , Meera Kamdar and Jason Snyder
Defendant:
Cyclebar Franchising, LLC, William Pryor and Heather Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark v. Presnell et al
as 6:2016cv00839
Plaintiff:
Kerry Daniel Clark
Defendant:
Gregory A. Presnell, T. Jo Fiat, Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
