Cases 1 - 10 of 18
PUGH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv17741
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM PUGH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith et al v. United States of America
as 6:2021cv00088
Plaintiff:
Billy Musgrave, Jose Reyes, Adrian Brantley and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. United States of America
as 4:2021cv00183
Plaintiff:
Billy Musgrave, Jose Reyes, Adrian Brantley and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PUGH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv73652
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM PUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pugh v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv01146
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
William Pugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pugh et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11949
Plaintiff:
Karem Rodriguez, Kevin Robinson, Theodore Rusnack and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
William Pugh v. Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC et al
as 8:2018cv00801
Defendant:
DOES and Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC
Plaintiff:
William Pugh
Elaine Anderson et al v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as CAC/2:17-cv-07535
Plaintiff:
Elaine Anderson , Suzanne Chester , Dorothy Cook and others
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. , Johnson and Johnson , Ethicon, Inc. and others
Elaine Anderson et al v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv07535
Plaintiff:
Connie Ackel, John Ackel, Elaine Anderson and others
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc., Caldera Medical, Inc. and others
Pugh et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2016cv01508
Plaintiff:
Martha Pugh and William Pugh
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
