Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Staples v. United States of America et al
as 5:2018cv03095
Plaintiff:
William Staples
Defendant:
United States of America, Mark S. Inch, Ian Conners and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Staples v. United States of America et al
as 5:2018cv03094
Plaintiff:
William Staples
Defendant:
United States of America, Mark S. Inch, Ian Conners and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
William Staples v. Joe Coakley
as 17-6421
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM STAPLES
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN JOE COAKLEY
Respondent:
TERRY O'BRIEN, Warden at USP-HAZ
Staples v. USA et al
as 1:2017cv00328
Plaintiff:
William Staples
Defendant:
USA, Charles Samuel, Jr, Harrell Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Staples v. USA, et al
as 16-3733
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM STAPLES
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHARLES SAMUEL, HARRELL WATTS, Administrator of National Inmate Appeals and others
Staples v. USA et al
as 1:2016cv01284
Plaintiff:
William Staples
Defendant:
USA , Charles Samuel , Harrell Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Staples v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 5:2016cv00711
Plaintiff:
William Staples
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Charles Samuel, Jr, Harrell Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Staples v. United States of America et al
as 5:2016cv03136
Plaintiff:
William Staples
Defendant:
United States of America, Charles Samuel, Jr., Harrell Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Staples v. United States of America et al
as 2:2016cv12367
Plaintiff:
William Staples
Defendant:
United States of America, Charles Samuel, Jr., Harrell Watts and others
Staples v. Maye
as 16-3135
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM STAPLES
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN CLAUDE MAYE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
