Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Bennett et al v. Murphy-Brown, LLC
as 7:2014cv00236
Plaintiff:
Tony Bennett , George Ester Fennell , Jerry Fennell, Sr. and others
Defendant:
Murphy-Brown, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. Willie Worsham
as 13-4698
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIE THOMAS WORSHAM
Thomas et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv10236
Plaintiff:
Lucille Thomas and Willie Thomas
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KELLY v. LEWIS, et al
as 1:2012cv01385
Plaintiff:
WILLIE THOMAS KELLY, JR.
Defendant:
ROBERT C. LEWIS, RICHARD NEELEY, FINESSE G. COUCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. 3M Business Products Sales, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv03270
Defendant:
3M Business Products Sales, Inc., Bayer CropScience, Inc., Pfizer, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Willie Thomas James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Ford v. Everett
as 3:2009cv00261
Petitioner:
Willie Thomas Ford
Respondent:
D. B. Everett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KELLY v. LOCKLEAR et al
as 1:2009cv00079
Plaintiff:
WILLIE THOMAS KELLY, JR.
Defendant:
DEAN LOCKLEAR and W. BOND
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
KELLY v. LOCKLEAR et al
as 1:2008cv00581
Plaintiff:
WILLIE THOMAS KELLY, JR.
Defendant:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, DONALD WOODS, W. BOND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. Vaughn et al
as 5:2007ct03125
Plaintiff:
Willie Thomas Kelly, Jr.
Defendant:
Nurse Vaughn, Rosemary Davidson, Harry Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KELLY v. VAUGHN et al
as 1:2007cv00329
Plaintiff:
WILLIE THOMAS KELLY, JR.
Defendant:
VAUGHN, ROSEMARY DAVIDSON, HARRY ALEXANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
