Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Windland v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00694
Plaintiff:
Joseph Windland
Interested Party:
SSA
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Coss v. Teters et al
as 2:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
James A. Coss, Jr.
Defendant:
David Teters, Tyler Teters, Connor Abraham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shine-Johnson et al v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 2:2022cv03236
Plaintiff:
Joeseph Shine-Johnson and Richard Stanton Whitman
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Marc Bratton, Eddy Bobby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WINDLAND v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv68172
Plaintiff:
JOHN WINDLAND
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Windland v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv02445
Plaintiff:
James Harry Windland
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Windland v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv28012
Plaintiff:
James Harry Windland
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Windland v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv00714
Plaintiff:
Timothy Alan Windland, Jr.
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Windland v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv18341
Plaintiff:
Timothy Alan Windland, Jr.
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mark Wilson v. City of Biloxi, Mississippi, et al
as 13-60658
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK KEVIN WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF BILOXI, MISSISSIPPI and KENNETH WINDLAND
Haynes et al v. Crawly et al
as 3:2013cv01083
Plaintiff:
Michael Haynes and Daryl C. Black
Defendant:
F. Crawly, S.L. Windland and C.C.I. Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
