Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Jerome Coast, Jr. v. Michael Hartmeyer, et al
as 23-13502
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEROME COAST, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL HARTMEYER, WARDEN SMITH STATE PRISON, JACKSON and others
Wilson v. Anderson et al
as 5:2022cv01492
Plaintiff:
Daniel M. Wilson
Defendant:
Officer Anderson, Officer MacMahaw, Sgt Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson v. Robertson et al
as 5:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
Royal Clark Robertson
Defendant:
Laticia Robertson, Mrs. Tina Witfield, NFN Stove and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PALLIPURATH v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2021cv04567
Defendant:
HAVIS INC., DR. COFFMAN, THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH M PALLIPURATH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edingburg v. Dart et al
as 1:2020cv05827
Defendant:
Service List, Mr. Walsh, Mr. Witfield and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald Edingburg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. Dart et al
as 1:2020cv04964
Defendant:
Mr. Walsh, Mr. Witfield, Tom Dart and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Barker, III v. BSI Financial Services, et al
as 19-35885
Defendant / Appellee:
BSI FINANCIAL SERVICES, CIVIC FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC, MONICA SAWATSKY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES MORSE BARKER III
Garcia et al v. Nicholson et al
as 1:2019cv06600
Defendant:
Sherwin Miles, Witfield, Walter Nicholson and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2018cv01854
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WOODELL v. PA. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AT GRATERFORD et al
as 2:2018cv01098
Plaintiff:
RANCOURT WOODELL
Defendant:
MIKE WENEROWICZ, JAY LANE, G. GALINSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
