Cases 21 - 30 of 589
WSP USA Solutions Inc. v. Secretary of the Army
as 23-1256
Appellant:
WSP USA SOLUTIONS INC.
Appellee:
SECRETARY OF THE ARMY
Armajo v. Wyoming Attorney General, et al
as 22-8049
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHARLES ALFRED ARMAJO, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
WYOMING ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF WYOMING and NEICOLE MOLDEN, Warden of WSP
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Healthcare Ally Management of California, LLC v. WSP USA, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04814
Plaintiff:
Healthcare Ally Management of California, LLC
Defendant:
WSP USA, Inc., Does 1-10 and Aetna Life Insurance Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract
Allah v. Jackson
as 4:2022cv05072
Petitioner:
Allah
Respondent:
Rob M Jackson doing business as Sup of WSP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
John Demos, Jr. v. Donald Holbrook, et al
as 22-35455
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
DONALD HOLBROOK, WSP Superintendent, JULIE MARTIN, KECIA L. RONGEN and others
Joseph Ewalan v. Donald Holbrook
as 22-35408
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSEPH LOCHUCH EWALAN
Respondent / Appellee:
DONALD HOLBROOK, WSP Superintendent
Nolau v. WSP USA Inc.
as 1:2022cv04276
Plaintiff:
Michael Nolau, Michael Rojas and David Jeannotte
Defendant:
WSP USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
John Demos, Jr. v. Cheryl Strange, et al
as 22-35299
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
CHERYL STRANGE, DOC Secretary, ROB JACKSON, WSP Supeintendent and CHRIS BOWMAN, Associate Superintent
McLoughlin v. A Russo Wrecking, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv09290
Plaintiff:
Thomas McLoughlin
Defendant:
A Russo Wrecking, Inc., AMEC Construction Management, Inc., AMEC Earth & Envoronmental, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 pl
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
