Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Daniels v. Pesterfield
as 1:2023cv02172
Plaintiff:
Tyrea T. Daniels
Defendant:
Walt Pesterfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00791
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00425
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Prigg v. Pesterfield
as 1:2023cv00346
Plaintiff:
Darius Lamont Prigg
Defendant:
Walt Pesterfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia et al v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2021cv01850
Plaintiff:
Audia Garcia and Eleana Garcia
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Jeff Hood, Walt Pesterfield and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kher v. Hickenlooper, et al
as 1:2015cv01782
Plaintiff:
Jim Kher and Mazen J. Kherdeen
Defendant:
John Hickenlooper, John (I) Hickenlooper, Colorado State Government Executive Branch ("CSGEB") and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Hager
as 1:2015cv00602
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Thompson
Defendant:
Steve Hager, Walt Pesterfield, Brandon Schafer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sepolen v. Pesterfield, et al
as 1:2015cv00437
Petitioner:
Ryan Sepolen
Respondent:
Walt Pesterfield and Elias Diggins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ippolito v. State of Colorado, et al
as 14-1480
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSEPH C. IPPOLITO
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Division of Adult Parole, JOHN W. HICKENLOOPER, Governor, RICK RAEMISCH, Executive Director (DOC) and others
Ippolito v. State of Colorado Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2014cv02576
Petitioner:
Joseph Christopher Ippolito
Respondent:
State of Colorado Department of Corrections, John W. Hickenlooper, Rick Raemisch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
