Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Garcia v. Warden King
as 4:2024cv00251
Petitioner:
Juan Daniel Garcia
Respondent:
Warden King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Samuelson v. King et al
as 4:2023cv01126
Petitioner:
Michael Dean Samuelson
Respondent:
Warden King, Rene Hinojosa and Russ Authier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Ward v. King
as 0:2023cv03327
Petitioner:
Joshua Lee Ward
Respondent:
Warden King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Preston Martin-Richardson v. King County Correctional Facility, et al
as 23-35402
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PRESTON EUGENE MARTIN-RICHARDSON
Defendant / Appellee:
KING COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, JOHN/JANE DOE, Warden, King County Correctional Facility, JOHN/JANE DOES 1-20, Director of Operations/Management and others
Creager v. King
as 0:2023cv01603
Petitioner:
Paul Everett Creager
Respondent:
Warden King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hill v. King
as 0:2023cv01365
Petitioner:
Antwain Euron Hill
Respondent:
Warden King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Timothy Ballanger v. Warden King
as 23-6324
Petitioner / Appellant:
TIMOTHY TERRELL BALLANGER
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN KING
Michael Gorbey v. Officer Dole, et al
as 22-3172
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER DOLE, USP Thomson, JOHN DOE, Sergeant, Dayshift Lieutenant, USP Thomson, CAPTAIN AVERY, USP Thomson and others
Michael Gorbey v. Mr. Barmes, et al
as 22-3173
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNSELOR BARMES, USP Thomson, THOMAS BERGAMI, Warden, USP Thomson, ASSOCIATE WARDEN KING, USP Thomson and others
Michael S. Gorbey v. Officer Dole, et al
as 22-2888
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER DOLE, USP Thomson, JOHN DOE, Sergeant, Dayshift Lt, USP Thomson, CAPTAIN AVERY, USP Thomson and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
