Cases 1 - 10 of 1,119
Austin v. Sherman et al
as 3:2024cv03113
Plaintiff:
Joseph Austin
Defendant:
Joseph Sherman, Michael Hendricks and Bobby Warner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eads v. Butler County Sheriffs Department et al
as 1:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
Joseph M Eads
Defendant:
Butler County Sheriffs Department, Butler County Jail, Nurse Kensworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Silvas v. Warner et al
as 2:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Julian Galvan Silvas, Jr
Defendant:
Lt. Warner, Sgt. Guiterez, Sgt. Syler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lundy v. Johnson et al
as 1:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Rossi Byron Lundy, Jr.
Defendant:
Tracy Johnson, Steve Warner, Michael Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warner v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 2:2024cv01565
Plaintiff:
Danny Lee Warner, Jr
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Tracy Reveal, Chae Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jason Tyrrell, et al v. Richard Robinson, et al
as 24-1266
Plaintiff:
JASON ALAN TYRRELL and ALVIN DWAYNE FRAZIER
Defendant:
RICHARD LEE ROBINSON, WILLIAM CHARLES VALKEMA, CRESTON JEROME HICKS and others
Dimas v. Warner
as 1:2024cv03044
Petitioner:
Ricardo Ochoa Dimas
Respondent:
Jack Warner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Norris Pegues v. Karl Hoffman, et al
as 24-1366
Plaintiff:
NORRIS E. PEGUES
Defendant:
KARL HOFFMAN, Doctor, LYNN DOBBERT and CANDACE WARNER
Brown v. Warner
as 2:2024cv00242
Petitioner:
Diondrae Brown
Respondent:
Jack Warner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Warner v. Harry et al
as 1:2024cv00307
Plaintiff:
William T. Warner
Defendant:
Dr. Laurel Harry, Bernadette Mason, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
