Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Thomas v. Royce
as 1:2019cv06781
Respondent:
Mark Royce
Petitioner:
Warren Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas v. 24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc.
as 4:2019cv02193
Plaintiff:
Warren Thomas
Defendant:
24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hill v. Krewson et al
as 4:2017cv01668
Plaintiff:
Theodis Hill
Defendant:
Lyda Krewson, Dale Glass, Adrian Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Summers v. City of Wenatchee Police Department et al
as 2:2016cv00371
Plaintiff:
Richard Thomas Summers
Defendant:
City of Wenatchee Police Department , City of Wenatchee Office of City Attorney, Chelan County District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Phinney v. Carson
as 4:2016cv00579
Plaintiff:
James Edwin Phinney, IV
Defendant:
Jeffery Carson, Francis Slay, Richard Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Mckinsey Steel & Supply of Florida Inc. et al
as 0:2014cv61069
Plaintiff:
Robert Telly Smith
Defendant:
Mckinsey Steel & Supply of Florida Inc. , Warren Thomas and Greg Damiani
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Luana Scott v. Family Dollar Stores, Inc.
as 13-2062
:
In re: FAMILY DOLLAR STORES, INCORPORATED, WAGE AND HOUR EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LUANA SCOTT, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated
Plaintiff:
TANYA LAKITSHA WARREN, a/k/a Tanya Warren-Thomas, CLAIR W. TROST, SR., KHIALLAH SOLOMON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
FAMILY DOLLAR STORES, INCORPORATED
THOMAS v. COLVIN
as 1:2013cv00533
Plaintiff:
WARREN THOMAS
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Fannie Mae v. 7575 White House, LLC et al
as 4:2011cv03763
Plaintiff:
Fannie Mae
Defendant:
7575 White House, LLC, Potrero Properties, LLC, Warren Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
