Cases 1 - 10 of 6,333
Joe Manis v. USDA
as 24-1367
Plaintiff:
JOE MANIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, THOMAS JAMES VILSACK, in his official capacity as the Secretary of Agriculture and MICHAEL WATSON, in his official capacity as Administrator of the Animal and Plant Health Administration
Watson v. Levy & Associates, LLC
as 1:2024cv00223
Plaintiff:
Jonathon Watson
Defendant:
Levy & Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
1925 Hooper LLC et al v. Watson Realty Corp. et al
as 3:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
1925 Hooper LLC, Robert J. Arko and Andrew M. Moore
Defendant:
Watson Realty Corp., Premiere Plus Realty Co., Charles Rutenberg Realty, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation
Harper v. Amur Equipment Finance, Inc, et al.
as 24-2413
Plaintiff:
JOHN HARPER
Defendant:
AMUR EQUIPMENT FINANCE, INC, WATSON & CHELIN MANUFACTERING, INC and ARTISAN AND TRUCKERS CASUALTY COMPANY
United States of America v. Artis (Campbell)
as 24-922
Defendant:
MALIK CAMPBELL, SOLOMON ARTIS, LEONARD BARLETTO and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Lawyers For Fair Reciprocal Admission v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-2213
Plaintiff:
LAWYERS FOR FAIR RECIPROCAL ADMISSION
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL, MARY H. MURGUIA, CHIEF CIRCUIT JUDGE and others
Johnson v. Watson et al
as 5:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Montrial D. Johnson
Defendant:
Elizabeth Watson, Lakin Matthews, R Delgado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WATSON v. APPLE INC.
as 2:2024cv04445
Plaintiff:
JACQUELINE WATSON
Defendant:
APPLE INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00710
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
