Cases 1 - 10 of 379
Watson v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
Johnny Watson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
MANIS v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE et al
as 1:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
JOE MANIS
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, THOMAS JAMES VILSACK and MICHAEL WATSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Hawkins v. Fountain, et al.
as 5:2024ct03048
Plaintiff:
Justin Hawkins
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant, Robert Fountain, Fred Robertson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDaniel v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2023cv00697
Plaintiff:
Tigress Sydney Acute McDaniel
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, North Carolina Department of Justice, North Carolina, North Carolina Administrative Office of the Courts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
HONEA v. WATSON et al
as 1:2023cv01041
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY A. HONEA
Defendant:
OFFICER WATSON, LIEUTENANT MCCORMICK, SERGEANT DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Advance Auto Parts, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv00611
Plaintiff:
Brian M Watson
Defendant:
Advance Auto Parts, Inc., Thomas R. Greco and Jeffrey W. Shepherd
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00572
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
Friday v. Carver et al
as 1:2023cv00276
Plaintiff:
Tevin Damato Friday
Defendant:
Ben Carver, FNU Cothran, Caroline Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00608
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Henry v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023ct03234
Plaintiff:
Robert Clinton Henry
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Roderick K. Watson and Timothy P. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
