Cases 21 - 30 of 30
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. v. MY ICIS, Inc. et al
as 5:2007cv05121
Plaintiff:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Defendant:
MY ICIS, Inc., Wayne Hicks and John Barrington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Phillipson v. Myicis et al
as 3:2007cv02412
Plaintiff:
Anthony Phillipson
Defendant:
Myicis and Wayne Hicks
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Sophia et al v. Myicis et al
as 3:2007cv02364
Plaintiff:
Christina Sophia and William Florian
Defendant:
Myicis and Wayne Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
Hicks v. Unknown Defendant
as 1:2007cv00919
Plaintiff:
Wayne Hicks
Defendant:
Warden, J.T. Rutledge State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Simons v. Myicis et al
as 2:2007cv00413
Plaintiff:
Raymond J Simons
Defendant:
Myicis, Wayne Hicks, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Pollock v. MYICIS et al
as 3:2007cv00304
Plaintiff:
Seth Pollock
Defendant:
MYICIS and Wayne Hicks
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Tabb v. MYICIS et al
as 3:2007cv00302
Plaintiff:
Roger L Tabb
Defendant:
MYICIS, Wayne Hicks and John and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Kimmel v. MYICIS et al
as 1:2007cv00369
Plaintiff:
Mark Kimmel
Defendant:
MYICIS and Wayne Hicks
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Moller v. MYICIS et al
as 1:2007cv00370
Plaintiff:
Heidi Moller
Defendant:
MYICIS and Wayne Hicks
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Faulkenberry et al v. Merck & Co Inc
as 2:2006cv11314
Plaintiff:
John Faulkenberry, John Wayne Hicks, Patricia A. Jenkins and others
Defendant:
Merck & Co Inc, Merck & Co Inc and Merck & Co Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
