Cases 21 - 30 of 269
United States of America v. $46,971.01 in funds seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account XXXXXX3913
as 1:2021cv03665
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$46,971.01 in funds seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account XXXXXX3913
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $94,215.89 FROM BB&T FUNDAMENTALS ACCOUNT ENDING IN 9435 et al
as 2:2021cv01056
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
$94,215.89 FROM BB&T FUNDAMENTALS ACCOUNT ENDING IN 9435, $278,528.13 FROM UNITED BANK ACCOUNT ENDING IN 7370, $83,441.64 FROM UNITED BANK ACCOUNT ENDING IN 4982 and others
United States of America v. 43,590.79 in Bank Funds Seized from Two Wells Fargo Bank Accounts et al
as 2:2021cv01380
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and United States of America
Defendant:
$43,590.79 IN BANK FUNDS SEIZED FROM TWO WELLS FARGO BANK ACCOUNTS, $11,621.10 IN BANK FUNDS SEIZED FROM ONE EAST WEST BANK ACCOUNT, 11,621.10 in Bank Funds Seized from One East West Bank Account and others
Claimant:
Shaobo Yu, Queena Qi and Xin Qi
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
USA v. Approx. $4,887.00 in U.S. Currency, et al.,
as 2:2021mc00043
Defendant:
Approximately $403.73 seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account Number 5677962762, Approximately $55.50 seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account Number 2693068070, Approximately $2,120.75 seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account Number 2803490131 and others
Claimant:
Doo Chul Kim
Plaintiff:
United States of America
United States of America v. $601,869.18 in United States currency formerly on deposit in Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Account Number 6250628085, held in the name of First Financial Investment Groups, LLC
as 1:2021cv01592
Defendant:
$601,869.18 in United States currency formerly on deposit in Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Account Number 6250628085, held in the name of First Financial Investment Groups, LLC
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
United States of America v. Approximately $4,887.00 in U.S. Currency et al
as 2:2021at00156
Defendant:
Approximately $403.73 seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account Number 5677962762, Approximately $55.50 seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account Number 2693068070, Approximately $2,120.75 seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account Number 2803490131 and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $662,632.00 Seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account 5342 et al
as 4:2020cv04279
Defendant:
$662,632.00 Seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account 5342, $252,845.11 Seized from JP Morgan Chase Bank Account 8897, $500,000.00 Seized from JP Morgan Chase Bank Account 7085 and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
USA v. $16,239.22 in U.S. Currency frozen in Wells Fargo Bank Account #3708803675 et al
as 1:2020cv03604
Defendant:
$16,239.22 in U.S. Currency frozen in Wells Fargo Bank Account #3708803675 and $22,580.10 in U.S. Currency frozen in Wells Fargo Bank Account #1140659531
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. $902,746.64 seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account #2525, et al
as 4:2020cv00960
Defendant:
$902,746.64 in Unites States Currency, Assorted Jewelry seized from Reshma Damanwalla on June 18, 2020, $34,424.46 seized from Whitney and Hancock Bank Account #0205 on June 19, 2020 and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. A 2020 Chevrolet Camaro, VIN: 1GFB1RX8L0107417 with all appurtenance and attachments thereon et al
as 2:2020cv00974
Defendant:
A 2020 Chevrolet Camaro, VIN: 1GFB1RX8L0107417 with all appurtenance and attachments thereon, A 2020 Chevrolet Camaro, VIN: 1G1FB1RX8L0107417 with all appurtenance and attachments thereon, $1,070.92 seized from Wells Fargo Bank Checking Account number XXXXXX9633 in the name of Carmen Brooke Lott and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
