Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01449
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Toy'N Around, Inc. v. Wham-O, Inc.
as 0:2014cv00175
Plaintiff:
Toy'N Around, Inc.
Defendant:
Wham-O, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brainstormproducts, LLC v. Wham-O, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01178
Plaintiff:
Brainstormproducts, LLC
Defendant:
Wham-O, Inc. and Wham-O Marketing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Unisource Worldwide Inc v. Troy Swope et al
as 2:2013cv02822
Movant:
Kyle Aguilar, Myke Rosales, Spring Toys Inc and others
Defendant:
Jane Doe Bearinger, Jared Gene Bearinger, James Bennitt, Jr and others
Plaintiff:
Unisource Worldwide Inc
FLFMC V WHAM-O
as 11-1067
Amicus Curiae:
Cato Institute, Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and Walter Olson
Plaintiff-Appellant:
FLFMC, LLC
Intervenor:
United States
Defendant-Appellee:
Wham-O, Inc.
Aviva Sports, Inc. v. Finderhut Direct Marketing, Inc. et al
as 3:2010mc80249
Plaintiff:
Aviva Sports, Inc.
Defendant:
Finderhut Direct Marketing, Inc., Menard, Inc., KMART Corporation and others
3rd_party_defendant:
Brian Dubinsky , Aquawood, LLC and Wham-O, Inc.
Worldslide LLC v. Wham-O, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv02025
Plaintiff:
Worldslide LLC
Defendant:
Wham-O, Inc. and Brands On Sale, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Worldslide LLC v. Wham-O, Inc. et al
as 2:2010at01110
Plaintiff:
Worldslide LLC
Defendant:
Wham-O, Inc. and Brands On Sale, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Shizzle Pop, LLC v. Wham-O, Inc.
as 2:2010cv03491
Plaintiff:
Shizzle Pop, LLC
Defendant:
Wham-O, Inc.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. WHAM-O, INC.
as 2:2010cv00435
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FLFMC, LLC.
Defendant:
WHAM-O, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
