Cases 1 - 10 of 87
Tucker v. VADOC et al
as 1:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
Taiveon Tucker
Defendant:
VADOC, Dunlevy, Whitehurst and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Monzon v. Whitehurst et al
as 3:2023cv00771
Plaintiff:
Roman Sebastian Monzon
Defendant:
Thomas Whitehurst, Eric T. Westfield, Ryan C. McCord and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elzey v. Huntington County et al
as 1:2023cv00355
Plaintiff:
Kortney Lee Elzey
Defendant:
Huntington County, Indiana State of, Jennifer Newton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitehurst v. Locklear et al
as 5:2023ct03236
Plaintiff:
Angelo Ronnell Whitehurst
Defendant:
Victor Locklear, Bruce Hodges, Sean T. Dillard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Boone et al
as 1:2023cv00425
Petitioner:
Mark A. Barnes
Defendant:
John Doe/Jane Doe Boone, Timothy Green, Kelvin McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jensen v. Daughtery et al
as 3:2022cv00816
Plaintiff:
Devon Jensen
Defendant:
D. Daughtery, R. Langford, S. Cain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitehurst v. Warden
as 1:2022cv02132
Plaintiff:
Diamond Whitehurst
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Burrell v. Bell et al
as 9:2022cv00770
Plaintiff:
Ako K. Burrell
Defendant:
Earl Bell, Webb, Kowlisk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burrell v. Annucci et al
as 9:2022cv00701
Plaintiff:
Ako K. Burrell
Defendant:
Anthony Annucci, Scott Kelly, Earl Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burrell v. Central New York Psychiatric Center et al
as 9:2022cv00344
Plaintiff:
Ako K. Burrell
Defendant:
Central New York Psychiatric Center, D. McIntosh, C. Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
