Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Ames v. Sharp
as 5:2023cv05167
Plaintiff:
Donald Lesley Ames, Jr.
Defendant:
Former Officer James Sharp, Sheriff Shawn Holloway, Parole Officer Emily Ennis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ames v. Ennis et al
as 5:2023cv05171
Plaintiff:
Donald Lesley Ames, Jr.
Defendant:
Parole Officer Emily Ennis, Mark Bernthal, Brenda Marshal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arrasheed v. Heastis et al
as 4:2023cv00380
Plaintiff:
NiJee Arrasheed
Defendant:
Heastis, Connally, McMullin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilhite v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 1:2021cv01043
Plaintiff:
Cindy D Wilhite and LaSanya D Morse
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Magness v. Kelley et al
as 4:2019cv00674
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Justine Minor, Justin Peter and others
Plaintiff:
John W Magness
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martz v. Brandon et al
as 1:2018cv00024
Defendant:
Christopher Brandon, Dalton Wayne Wallace, Garrett Gillihan and others
Plaintiff:
Hollis Devin Martz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tubbs v. Garland County, Arkansas et al
as 6:2017cv06032
Plaintiff:
Brandon Michael Tubbs
Defendant:
Garland County, Arkansas, Anthony J. Tart, Eric Wilhite and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilhite et al v. Little Rock, City of et al
as 4:2015cv00174
Plaintiff:
William Heath Wilhite and Amy Wilhite
Defendant:
Little Rock, City of and Rusty Rothwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilhite v. Lexicon Inc
as 4:2015cv00061
Plaintiff:
Billy Wilhite
Defendant:
Lexicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00241
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
