Cases 1 - 10 of 491
Hart v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00391
Plaintiff:
William Monroe Hart
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company v. Lassiter et al
as 4:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Defendant:
Brenda Lassiter and Donna L. Hart
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company v. Lassiter et al
as 4:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Defendant:
Brenda Lassiter and Donna L. Hart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company v. Brenda et al
as 4:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Defendant:
Lassiter Brenda and Hart L. Donna
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Hart v. SouthState Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2024cv01905
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hart
Defendant:
SouthState Bank, N.A. and SouthState Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Pryor v. City of Charleston et al
as 2:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Jerome Pryor
Defendant:
City of Charleston, Detective W. McCabe, Cory Jarett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
New York Life Insurance Company v. Sallet et al
as 3:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
New York Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Dexter Sallet, Andrea Hart and Ralph Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
HART v. USA
as 1:2024cv00170
Petitioner:
JORDAN HART
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
HART v. USA
as 1:2024cv00141
Petitioner:
JORDAN HART
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
