Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Due v. Hoffman et al
as 8:2022cv00251
Plaintiff:
Randall David Due
Defendant:
Matthew R. Hoffman and Robert T. Dawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Due v. Dawson et al
as 8:2022cv00252
Plaintiff:
Randall David Due
Defendant:
Robert T. Dawson, Matthew R. Hoffman and Brian D. Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Due v. Bataillon et al
as 8:2020cv00172
Defendant:
Richard G. Koph, Matthew R. Hoffman, Warden Werlich and others
Plaintiff:
Randall David Due
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hoffman v. Correct Care Solutions, Inc. et al
as 8:2020cv00101
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, Inc. and Douglas County, Nebraska
Plaintiff:
Ronald Hoffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv00354
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
United States of America v. Schunk et al
as 4:2018cv03117
Defendant:
Tamera Pickel, Taren Hoffman, Clayton Heinrich and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
Widtfeldt v. City of Atkinson et al
as 8:2018cv00150
Defendant:
Ashley D. Boettcher, Tim Braun, Wayne Braun and others
402) 925-2564 (fax:
James Widtfeldt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Bauer v. Professional Choice Recovery, et al
as 4:2016cv03148
Plaintiff:
Austin Bauer
Defendant:
James Cada, Edward Hoffman, Linda Jewson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Lundahl et al v. Hoffman et al
as 4:2016cv03000
Defendant:
Does 1-10 Inc., Glenna Gottfredson, Kristi Gould and others
303) 212-6888 (fax:
Holli Lundahl
307) 212-6888 (fax:
Logan Lundahl
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv00241
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
