Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 1,814
Keeton v. Maddox (INMATE 1) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00027
Plaintiff: Raymond Mitchell Keeton
Defendant: Andrew L. Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dymatize Enterprises, LLC v. Defiance Brands, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00152
Plaintiff: Dymatize Enterprises, LLC
Defendant: Defiance Brands, Inc., Dan Maddox, II and Brian Burgdorf
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00056
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Urve Maggitti v. Bret Binder, et al
as 24-1169
Plaintiff: URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant: BRET M. BINDER, DEBRA RYAN, DANIEL E. ROLAND and others
Alexander v. Bernard et al
as 1:2024cv01088
Plaintiff: Liam Alexander
Defendant: Gina Bernard and Rachel Ness-Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Harrison v. Maddox et al
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff: Winston L. Harrison
Defendant: Bruce Maddox, Marvin W. Wiggins, Erica K. Kemmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mills v. Maddox
as 1:2024cv00630
Petitioner: Jimmy David Mills
Respondent: Melody Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sayles v. Maddox et al
as 1:2024cv01046
Plaintiff: Nicholas R. Sayles
Defendant: Chief Sheriff Melody Maddox, Larandy Akies and Dr. Barten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maddox v. Ann Jordan We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00925
Plaintiff: Asunji R. Maddox
Defendant: Carol Ann Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00172
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?