Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Mayfield v. Williams et al
as 4:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
William T Mayfield
Defendant:
Chris E Williams, Norman B Frisby, Teresa J Howell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayfield v. Wright et al
as 4:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
William T Mayfield
Defendant:
Rodney Wright, Gilliam and Schafer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayfield v. Cooper et al
as 4:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
William T Mayfield
Defendant:
Cooper, Gilliam, Parsons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayfield v. Gilliam et al
as 4:2023cv01214
Plaintiff:
William T Mayfield
Defendant:
Gilliam, King, Blaine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Mayfield v. Danny Clark, et al
as 23-3603
Plaintiff / Appellant:
William Timothy Mayfield
Defendant / Appellee:
Danny Clark, Jail Administrator, Sheridan Detention Center, Dexter Payne, Director, ADC and Ray Vance, Sheriff, Grant County
William Mayfield v. Randy Murray, et al
as 16-4377
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William Timothy Mayfield
Defendant - Appellee:
Randy Murray, Administrator, Van Buren County Jail, Scott Bradley, Sheriff, Van Buren County Jail and Tracy Sutterfield, Administration, Van Buren County Jail
Mayfield v. Briann et al
as 4:2016cv00736
Plaintiff:
William Timothy Mayfield
Defendant:
Briann and Massiet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayfield v. Higgins et al
as 4:2016cv00709
Plaintiff:
William Timothy Mayfield
Defendant:
Gary Higgins and Serena Brawley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayfield v. Murray et al
as 4:2016cv00683
Plaintiff:
William Timothy Mayfield
Defendant:
Randy Murray, Scott Bradley and Tracy Sutterfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv00908
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
