Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Hamid Karamian v. Henrik Fisker et al
as 2:2024cv01867
Plaintiff:
Hamid Karamian
Defendant:
Henrik Fisker, Geeta Gupta-Fisker, Mark E. Hickson and others
Aberdeen City Council v. Under Armour, Incorporated
as 19-2032
Defendant / Appellee:
MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INCORPORATED, PNC CAPITAL MARKETS, LLC, BYRON K. ADAMS, JR. and others
Defendant:
BRAD DICKERSON and ANTHONY W. DEERING
Plaintiff:
MONROE COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, BEN STENGER, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, BRIAN BREECE, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BUCKS COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FUND, ABERDEEN CITY COUNCIL, as Administrating Authority for the North East Scotland Pension Fund and BUCKS COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FUND, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Petitioner:
WILLIAM DENT, BERNARDO MEDELLIN, SACRAMENTO CITY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Armstrong Development Properties, Inc. v. SG Ellison, et al
as 2:2014cv00929
Plaintiff:
Armstrong Development Properties, Inc.
Defendant:
SG Ellison , Peter G. Shimkus , Brandon M. Stein and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
ARMSTRONG DEVELOPMENT PROPERTIES, INC. v. SG ELLISON et al
as 2:2013cv01590
Plaintiff:
ARMSTRONG DEVELOPMENT PROPERTIES, INC.
Defendant:
SG ELLISON , PETER G. SHIMKUS , BRANDON M. STEIN and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
McDermott v. Marcus, Errico, Emmer & Brook
as 13-2181
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM M. MCDERMOTT
Defendant - Appellee:
MARCUS, ERRICO, EMMER & BROOKS, PC
William M. McDermott v Marcus et al
as 1:2009cv10159
Plaintiff:
William Michael McDermott
Defendant:
Marcus, Errico, Emmer & Brooks, P.C.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.