Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Bowles v. Pinnacle RV Transport, Inc.
as 1:2014cv03827
Plaintiff:
William Bowles
Defendant:
Pinnacle RV Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. McDonald et al
as 4:2013cv00491
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Bruce McDonald, James William Bowling and Rooster and Roses Sports Pub
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934
Cates v. Bowles et al
as 3:2012cv00631
Plaintiff:
Lonnie J. Cates
Defendant:
William Bowles and Michael Bowles
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
BOWLES et al v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv47875
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BOWLES , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Bowles v. United States of America
as 2:2011cv01474
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
William Bowles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Barker et al v. The City of Troy, New York et al
as 1:2010cv01488
Plaintiff:
Steven Barker , John Becker , Patrick Bornt and others
Defendant:
The City of Troy, New York, Harry Tutunjian and John Tedesco
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
BOWLES v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv31354
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BOWLES
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Dewitt et al v. City of Troy et al
as 1:2009cv00016
Plaintiff:
Jamel Dewitt and Marquese Hill
Defendant:
City of Troy, William Bowles, Stephen Seney and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bridgeforth v. County of Rensselaer et al
as 1:2008cv00779
Plaintiff:
Otis Bridgeforth
Defendant:
County of Rensselaer, City of Troy, Richard F. Reilly, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv02957
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
