Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Edwards v. Gilley
as 3:2026cv01314
Petitioner:
Jay William Edwards
Respondent:
Warden John Gilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. William Spencer
as 26-13046
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
WILLIAM EDWARD SPENCER
Bridenhagen v. Boyden
as 1:2026cv10110
Plaintiff:
John Bridenhagen
Defendant:
William Edward Boyden
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Hicks et al v. Carey et al
as 2:2026cv04205
Plaintiff:
Darius Hicks, Rodquel Jones, Steven Todd Weldon and others
Defendant:
Dwayne Carey, Benjamin Miller, Jeff Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EICHLER et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2026cv02592
Plaintiff:
DARIUSZ J. EICHLER, LIZZIE FINNEY, ARLESIA FINNEY and others
Defendant:
THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN and IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
Edwards v. Bisignano
as 0:2026cv03158
Plaintiff:
Richard William Edwards
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 425 Social Security Benefits
Franklin v. Blanchard et al
as 1:2026cv00091
Plaintiff:
KHALID FRANKLIN
Defendant:
JUDGE GRADY BLANCHARD, GWENDOLYN BOVAN, Bobby L. Christine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FRANKLIN v. BLANCHARD et al
as 5:2026cv00172
Plaintiff:
KHALID FRANKLIN
Defendant:
JUDGE GRADY BLANCHARD, VETERANS CANTEEN SERVICES, GWENDOLYN BOVAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Biolsi v. Price
as 3:2026cv00341
Plaintiff:
Debra Biolsi
Defendant:
William Edwards Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
William Gray v. Dexter Payne
as 26-1788
Plaintiff:
William Edward Gray
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Division of Correction, Arkansas Department of Corrections
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
