Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Smoot v. Frazier
as 8:2010cv01563
Plaintiff: Charles Lee Smoot
Defendant: Williams Frazier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00843
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
USA v. William Frazier
as 10-1817
Plaintiff - Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: WILLIAM FRAZIER, a/k/a Rich Moore
USA v. Craig Frazier
as 10-35207
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: CRAIG WILLIAM FRAZIER
Frazier v. Wingo et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv01827
Petitioner: William Frazier
Defendant: Tony Wingo and Unknown Correctional Officers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Craig Frazier, et al v. USDCGF
as 09-73151
Petitioner: CRAIG WILLIAM FRAZIER and CRAIG WILLIAM FRAZIER
Respondent: USDC, GREAT FALLS
Real Party In Interest: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Frazier v. USA
as 4:2009cv00097
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Craig William Frazier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
FRAZIER ET AL. v. AC AND S, INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY) et al
as 2:2009cv88594
Plaintiff: CLARY FRAZIER and PAUL WILLIAM FRAZIER
Defendant: AC AND S, INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY), A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
USA v. William Frazier We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-3359
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: WILLIAM FRAZIER, also known as Bilal also known as Trayvon Scott
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-17434
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?