Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Anthony Bennett v. Joseph Biden, Jr.
as 24-1306
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BENNETT, a/k/a Bennett Anthony
Defendant:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., JEROME POWELL, JANET L. YELLEN and others
Vaughn v. Gates et al
as 4:2021cv00503
Plaintiff:
William Vaughn and Mosias
Defendant:
John G. Roberts, Jr., Michael R. Pence, Melinda Gates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diphilipo v. Ballmer et al
as 2:2014cv00586
Plaintiff:
Stephen Diphilipo
Defendant:
Steven A. Ballmer , Dina D. Dublon , William H Gates, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barovic v. Ballmer et al
as 2:2014cv00540
Plaintiff:
Kim Barovic
Defendant:
Steven A. Ballmer , Dina D. Dublon , William H. Gates III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roy Day v. Microsoft Corporation, et al
as 14-35109
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROY A. DAY
Defendant - Appellee:
MICROSOFT CORPORATION, WILLIAM H. GATES, III and STEVEN A. BALLMER
Reiffin v. Microsoft Corporation et al
as 3:2011cv03505
Plaintiff:
Martin Gardner Reiffin
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation , William H. Gates, III and Steven A. Ballmer
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Arelious Muckle v. UNCF, et al
as 10-13122
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARELIOUS MUCKLE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNCF, a.k.a. United Negro College Fund, BILL & MELINDA GATES FOUNDATION, a.k.a. Gates Foundation, DR. MICHAEL LOMAX, CEO of UNCF, individually and in his official capacity and others
Muckle v. UNCF et al
as 1:2009cv02387
Plaintiff:
Arelious Muckle
Defendant:
UNCF, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Michael Lomax and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Type:
Other Statutes
Muckle v. UNCF et al
as 1:2009mi00335
Plaintiff:
Arelious Muckle
Defendant:
UNCF, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Michael Lomax and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Type:
Other Statutes
Cullom v. Gates
as 2:2007cv01640
Plaintiff:
Paul C Cullom, Jr
Defendant:
William H Gates, III
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
