Cases 11 - 20 of 36
HICKS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv69564
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HICKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hicks v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company et al
as 4:2020cv01436
Defendant:
Eddie Blagg and Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
William Hicks, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
HICKS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv42493
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JACOB WILLIAM HICKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HICKS v. LASH et al
as 5:2020cv01492
Defendant:
GEORGE HUTT, INC. and CHARLES N. LASH
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HICKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lavergne et al v. Princeton Excess & Surplus Lines Insurance Co et al
as 1:2020cv00265
Plaintiff:
Laura Lavergne and Anthony Lavergne
Defendant:
Cassie Saucier, Steven Cloessner, William E Hilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ivey et al v. City of West Melbourne et al
as 6:2020cv00287
Defendant:
Brevard County Sheriff's Office, West Melbourne Police Department, City of Melbourne and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Richard Ivey, Jr. and Chevonda Ivey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lazano v. USA et al
as 1:2019cv01181
Defendant:
Shane Johnson, Ian Connors, USA and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Amaya Lazano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Linder v. Hicks
as 1:2019cv01175
Petitioner:
David W Linder
Respondent:
William . Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Arnett v. Hicks et al
as 1:2019cv04755
Defendant:
Aaron Lipson and William Hicks
Plaintiff:
Cazal Arnett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hicks v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2018cv00206
Plaintiff:
George William Hicks
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
