Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Gordon Linton v. Troy Bowser
as 20-35341
Respondent / Appellee:
TROY BOWSER, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
GORDON WILLIAM LINTON
Hall v. Tanner et al
as 5:2019cv00066
Defendant:
Jacqueline Bunn, Ofc. John Spears, Terry Barnard and others
Plaintiff:
Loren D. Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Linton v. Bowser
as 2:2018cv00424
Respondent:
Troy Bowser
Petitioner:
Gordon William Linton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Linton
as 3:2018cv00424
Respondent:
Troy Bowser
Petitioner:
Gordon William Linton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas et al v. Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv11237
Plaintiff:
William Linton Thomas and Isabelle Thomas
Defendant:
Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jamal Investments, Inc. d/b/a Cherry Park Automotive v. Ohio Security Insurance Company et al
as 4:2016cv03601
Plaintiff:
Jamal Investments, Inc. d/b/a Cherry Park Automotive
Defendant:
Ohio Security Insurance Company and Garon William Linton, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Puckette et al v. The City of Flowery Branch et al
as 2:2015cv00018
Plaintiff:
Bryan G. Puckette and Carolyn W. Puckette
Defendant:
The City of Flowery Branch, William Linton Andrew, Jr., David Spillers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon v. Reserve National Insurance Company et al
as 2:2012cv00063
Plaintiff:
Kurt L Gordon
Defendant:
Reserve National Insurance Company and William Linton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roger William Linton v. Indymac FSB et al
as 5:2010cv00353
Defendant:
Does, Indymac FSB, NDEX West LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Roger William Linton
Martin et al v. Cox et al
as 2:2007cv00296
Plaintiff:
Marquis A Martin and Marlon Cook
Defendant:
Stephen J Cox, William Linton, Eric Whiteside and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
