Cases 31 - 40 of 153
Renderos v. Wolf et al
as 1:2020cv00934
Respondent:
Acting Secretary Chad F. Wolf, Camila Wamsly, Jeffrey Crawford and others
Petitioner:
Jose Osorio Renderos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Banks-Davis v. Adams et al
as 3:2020cv00149
Petitioner:
Lennora R. Banks-Davis
Respondent:
P. Adams, William P. Barr, B. Antonelli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hewlett v. Barr et al
as 5:2020hc02159
Petitioner:
William Hewlett
Respondent:
T. Scarantino and William P. Barr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ledgister v. Joyce et al
as 2:2020cv02236
Defendant:
William Joyce and William P Barr
Plaintiff:
Basil Ledgister
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Monelle v. Barr et al
as 3:2020cv00882
Respondent:
Acting Secretary Chad Wolf, William P. Barr, Department of Homeland Security and others
Petitioner:
Cherance Monelle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McDonald v. Searls et al
as 1:2020cv00993
Respondent:
Jeffrey Searls, Chad F. Wolf, Attorney General William P Barr and others
Petitioner:
Kingsley Junior McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McDonald v. Searls et al
as 6:2020cv06561
Respondent:
Jeffrey Searls, Chad F. Wolf, Attorney General William P Barr and others
Petitioner:
Kingsley Junior McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Matlets v. Horton et al
as 4:2020cv01041
Respondent:
Jonathan Horton, Keith Peek, Chad F Wolf and others
Petitioner:
Yevhenii Matlets
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Tawalbeh v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv00844
Respondent:
Acting Secretary Chad F. Wolf, Jeffrey Crawford, James Mullan and others
Petitioner:
Fahed Tawalbeh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Massaly v. Gillis et al
as 5:2020cv00155
Defendant:
Diane L. Witte, Attorney General William P. Barr, Warden Shawn R. Gillis and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Victor Jerry Massaly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
