Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Santiago v. Roden
as 12-1620
Petitioner: WILLIAM SANTIAGO
Respondent: GARY RODEN
Santiago v. Roden
as 1:2011cv11604
Petitioner: William Santiago
Respondent: Gary Roden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Santiago v. Kerestes et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv01319
Petitioner: William Santiago
Respondent: John Kerestes and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RODRIGUEZ et al v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 5:2011cv39946
Plaintiff: WILLIAM SANTIAGO RODRIGUEZ , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant: FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Santiago-Ramos v. FNU Sanchez et al
as 3:2009cv02135
Plaintiff: William Santiago-Ramos
Defendant: FNU Sanchez and Attorney General Puerto Rico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Santiago-Ramos v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2009cv02134
Plaintiff: William Santiago-Ramos
Defendant: Department of Corrections and Nancy Blass
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02388
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
HARTFORD UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY et al v. J.B.HUNT. TRANSPORT, INC. et al
as 3:2009cv00514
Plaintiff: HARTFORD UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY and HARTFORD UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant: J.B.HUNT. TRANSPORT, INC., WILLIAM SANTIAGO-PENA and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury None
SANTIAGO et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2008cv04068
Plaintiff: WILLIAM SANTIAGO, WILLIAM SANTIAGO, WILLIAM SANTIAGO and others
Defendant: CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and JOHN DOES 1-50
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SPRADLEY et al v. SANTIAGO-PENA et al
as 3:2008cv01679
Plaintiff: MARY ADELE SPRADLEY and CURTIS O SPRADLEY
Defendant: WILLIAM SANTIAGO-PENA, J.B. HUNT TRANSPORT, INC., JOHN DOE 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?