Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Seay v. Occidental Fire and Casualty Company of NC
as 2:2022cv03914
Plaintiff:
William Seay
Defendant:
Occidental Fire and Casualty Company of NC, Occidental Fire & Casualty Insurance Company and Occidental Fire & Casualty Company of North Carolina
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
SEAY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv93546
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM SEAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DEDRICK et al v. BANET
as 4:2018cv00183
Plaintiff:
WESLEY D. STOCKTON, TOBIAS JONES, RAYMOND CARR, JR. and others
Defendant:
BANET
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re Robert A. Ferrante
as 8:2017cv01916
Appellee:
Thomas H Casey and Thomas A. Vogele and Associates, APC
In Re Debtor:
Robert A. Ferrante
Appellant:
William Seay
Seay v. Sheriff Al Cannon Detention Center
as 2:2017cv02814
Petitioner:
Broderick William Seay, Jr
Respondent:
Al Cannon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv02076
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In re: Remar Investments, LP v. William Seay, et al
as 16-56446
Debtor:
In the Matter of: ROBERT A. FERRANTE
Appellant:
REMAR INVESTMENTS, LP, a Nevada limited partnership
Appellee:
WILLIAM SEAY, Lt. Col., U.S.M.C. Ret. and THOMAS H. CASEY, Chapter 7 Trustee
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv00337
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Seay v. Manitex, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00613
Plaintiff:
William Seay
Defendant:
Manitex, Inc., John Doe Manufacturer 1-5 and John Doe Distributor 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
William Seay v. Anchor Packing Co., et al.
as PAE/2:10-CV-68324
Plaintiff:
William Seay
Defendant:
Anchor Packing Co
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
