Cases 1 - 10 of 20
STOKES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv70747
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM STOKES
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STOKES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv01970
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM STOKES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stokes v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv03937
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
William Stokes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HENRY et al v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2019cv03078
Plaintiff:
WESLEY BRAND, HADRIAN CLEAGUE, VICTOR VOLYNETS and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Henry et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02082
Plaintiff:
Wesley Brand, Hadrian Cleague, Victor Volynets and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Esurance Property & Casualty Company v. Beasley et al
as 1:2019cv00404
Defendant:
William Stokes, Unitedhealthcare Insurance Company, J.L. Bedsole Rotary Rehabilitation Hospital and others
Plaintiff:
Esurance Property & Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Cowan v. Miller et al
as 2:2017cv00037
Plaintiff:
William Stokes Cowan #229059, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown Miller and Jeffrey Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GinA v. CITY OF AUGUSTA MAINE et al
as 1:2016cv00100
Plaintiff:
GinA
Defendant:
CITY OF AUGUSTA MAINE, WILLIAM STOKES, WILLIAM BRIDGEO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stokes et al v. Smith et al
as 2:2015cv00086
Plaintiff:
William Stokes, James Huffins and Carl Lee Ward
Defendant:
J R Smith, Michael Bachand and Mike Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stokes v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as 6:2013cv01600
Plaintiff:
William Stokes
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc, Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd, Takeda Pharmaceuticals L L C and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
