Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Schafer v. Direct Energy Services, LLC
as 22-2889
Plaintiff:
James Brietfeller and William Underwood
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Richard Schafer
Defendant / Appellee:
Direct Energy Services, LLC
Underwood v. Unknown
as 1:2022cv01038
Plaintiff:
Randy William Underwood
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schafer v. Direct Energy Services, LLC
as 20-3084
Defendant / Appellee:
Direct Energy Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
James Brietfeller and William Underwood
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Richard Schafer
UNDERWOOD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv12498
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
UNDERWOOD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv75773
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Underwood v. Saul
as 3:2020cv50144
Plaintiff:
William Underwood
Defendant:
Commissioner Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
UNDERWOOD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv63247
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCHAFER et al v. DIRECT ENERGY SERVICES, LLC
as 6:2019cv06907
Defendant:
DIRECT ENERGY SERVICES, LLC
Plaintiff:
JAMES BRIETFELLER, WILLIAM UNDERWOOD and RICHARD SCHAFER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PAYSEUR et al v. UNDERWOOD et al
as 2:2016cv04509
Plaintiff:
RONALD B PAYSEUR and MITCHELL LARES
Defendant:
WILLIAM UNDERWOOD , MICHAEL AMBROSE , RICHARD DUDA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Henderson v. City of Cape Girardeau, et al.
as 1:2014cv00064
Plaintiff:
Christopher A Henderson
Defendant:
William Underwood and Cape Girardeau, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
