Cases 1 - 10 of 229
Martin v. Harris County Sheriff Department et al
as 4:2024cv04396
Defendant:
Sean Kelly McPherson, Sherea McKenzie, Harris County Sheriff Department and others
Plaintiff:
Vincent A. Martin, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ed Loyde v. Odom, et al
as 24-5943
Plaintiff:
ED HENRY LOYDE
Defendant:
WILLIS DAVIS, Inmate from SCJC, JANE DOE, Officer #2, MED PLEX NURSE and others
Nationstar Mortgage LLC v. Davis et al
as 2:2024cv02651
Plaintiff:
Nationstar Mortgage LLC
Defendant:
Willie Davis, Housing and Urban Development and Zelma Jean Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Davis (PS) v. A. Ciolli
as 1:2024cv02110
Petitioner:
Willie Davis
Respondent:
A. Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Jester et al
as 1:2024cv03244
Petitioner:
WILLIE DAVIS
Respondent:
Georgia Department of Collections, Teketa Jester and Central State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DAVIS v. JESTER et al
as 5:2024cv00237
Respondent:
TEKETA JESTER, CENTRAL STATE PRISON and GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF COLLECTIONS
Petitioner:
WILLIE DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Huckabee v. Stirling et al
as 8:2024cv03756
Defendant:
Matt Watson, Joel Anderson, LT Martin A. Delk and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lee Huckabee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
McCoy v. Stirling et al
as 8:2024cv03577
Defendant:
Esther Laborador, Willie Davis, Director Stacy Richardson and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew McCoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
McCoy v. Stirling et al
as 8:2024cv03558
Defendant:
Stephanie Skewes, Esther Laborador, Bryan Stirling and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell F McCoy, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
