Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Alexander et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 1:2021cv03505
Counter Claimant:
lEIGH aNNE jONES, Andrea Henderson-Lesesne, Raymond Alexander and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Jphn Dimor, jOAN Lalicata and Christina Henderson
Plaintiff:
Sherif Mcsiha, Ratmond Czajkowski, Jristopher Paultre and others
Counter Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333 Civil Remedies: Anti-Terrorism Act of 1991
LEWIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv57983
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WINSTON LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lewis et al v. Boston Scientific Corp et al
as 5:2019cv00818
Defendant:
A B C Insurance Co and Boston Scientific Corp
Plaintiff:
Charles Winston Lewis and Rita Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Abernethy et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv12309
Plaintiff:
Kristen Folberth, Christopher Gibbs, Melissa Lawson and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv07599
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Lewis v. Ashby
as 3:2012cv00226
Plaintiff:
Winston Lewis
Defendant:
Matt Ashby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis v. Ashby
as 1:2012cv00310
Plaintiff:
Winston Lewis
Defendant:
Matt Ashby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
as 4:2011cv00070
Plaintiff:
Winston Lewis
Defendant:
The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
US v. Jeffrey Lewi
as 11-4375
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JEFFREY WINSTON LEWIS
US v. Jeffrey Lewis
as 10-4131
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JEFFREY WINSTON LEWIS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
