Cases 1 - 10 of 271
Mack v. Wolcott
as 1:2024cv00366
Petitioner:
Terrance Mack
Respondent:
Julie Wolcott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00269
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Coleman v. Wolcott et al
as 6:2024cv06182
Plaintiff:
Windsor Coleman
Defendant:
Wolcott, Tomprowski and John Doe/Mr. H
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Wolcott Police Department
as 4:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Jerren Jones
Defendant:
Wolcott Police Department and Winkler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garcia v. Wolcott
as 6:2023cv06718
Petitioner:
Frank Garcia
Respondent:
J. Wolcott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00603
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
JONES v. WOLCOTT POLICE DEPARTMENT
as 1:2023cv02261
Plaintiff:
JARREN JONES and JERREN JONES
Defendant:
WOLCOTT POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WOLCOTT v. THADES et al
as 3:2023cv22300
Plaintiff:
BRANDON P. WOLCOTT
Defendant:
CHUCK THADES and TOWBOATUS BARGENGUT LIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Wilson v. Chatham County Detention Center et al
as 4:2023cv00296
Plaintiff:
Hakeem Wilson
Defendant:
Chatham County Detention Center, Chatham County Sheriff's Office, Whitney Gregory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COSTAR GROUP, INC. et al v. HAPPENING TECHNOLOGY, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv02871
Plaintiff:
COSTAR GROUP, INC. and COSTAR REALTY INFORMATION, INC.
Defendant:
HAPPENING TECHNOLOGY, INC., GUY WOLCOTT, JOHN MAZUR and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
