Cases 31 - 40 of 560
US v. Antonio Woods
as 23-6763
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANTONIO R. WOODS, a/k/a Toby
TYLER v. SMITH et al
as 1:2023cv00650
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Defendant:
DAVID B. SMITH, THE FORSYTH COUNTY L.E.D.C, ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James v. Woods et al
as 5:2023cv00262
Plaintiff:
Myron Sylvester James
Defendant:
Doctor Woods, Doctor Brishman, Lt. Siole and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Steve Riddick v. C. Mickles
as 23-6655
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVE RIDDICK, a/k/a Steven Riddick
Defendant / Appellee:
C/O C. MICKLES, C/O C. TAYLOR, C/O J. BOYD and others
Defendant:
LT. T. L. WOODS, LARRY MULLENS, Hearings Officer and WARDEN JEFFREY KISER
Henderson v. Frierson et al
as 4:2023cv03022
Plaintiff:
Aryee Henderson
Defendant:
Sgt. Frierson, Tonya Williams-Wallace, Melissa Franklin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Wood v. Weber et al
as 1:2023cv01705
Plaintiff:
Shelton Lamont Wood
Defendant:
R. Shane Weber, Bradley O. Butler, Sgt. Alicia Cartwright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Willie Woods v. H. Ray
as 23-6565
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIE PERRY WOODS
Respondent / Appellee:
H. RAY, Warden FCI Hazelton
Steve Riddick v. C. Mickles
as 23-6477
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVE RIDDICK, a/k/a Steven Riddick
Defendant / Appellee:
C/O C. MICKLES, C/O J. BOYD, C/O J. GILBERT and others
James v. Abraham et al
as 5:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
Myron Sylveste James
Defendant:
Lt. W/F Abraham, Doctor PA Wood, Doctor PA Burishman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Woods v. ECI - East and Medical Department, et al
as 1:2023cv00996
Plaintiff:
Lorne Woods
Defendant:
ECI - East and Medical Department, R.N. Sarah Johnson, Dr. Raab and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
