Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 100
USA v. Floyd Wyche
as 26-12263
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: FLOYD ELLIS WYCHE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02238
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Vaughan v. Dowd et al
as 3:2026cv00447
Plaintiff: Pedro Darnell Vaughan
Defendant: Josh Wyche, Sr., Boyce and Wilbur J. David, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv11779
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Wyche v. Dotson et al
as 3:2026cv00318
Plaintiff: Nehemiah Wyche
Defendant: Chadwick Dotson, Joseph Walters, Warden Kevin McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Wyche v. Dotson et al
as 3:2026cv00314
Plaintiff: Nehemiah Wyche
Defendant: Chadwick Dotson, Joseph Walters, Kemsy Bowles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
WYCHE v. PFIZER INC et al
as 3:2026cv01766
Plaintiff: SHANNON L WYCHE
Defendant: PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA & UPJOHN CO LLC and PHARMACIA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2026cv00515
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Copeland v. Armbruster et al
as 3:2026cv00174
Plaintiff: Darrell Andrew Copeland
Defendant: Sgt. B. Armbruster, Magistrate Alanna Rawls, Richard L. Francis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neblock et al v. University of Phoenix Incorporated
as 2:2026cv00261
Plaintiff: Melissa Neblock and Antonyo Wyche
Defendant: University of Phoenix Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?