Cases 1 - 10 of 325
Valles et al v. Amazon.com LLC et al
as 3:2024cv06233
Plaintiff:
Jacquelyn Perez, Marbleane Bond, Xiomara Carlos and others
Defendant:
Amazon.com LLC and Amazon.com Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
Cubero-Santiago v. Rodrguez-Bonet et al
as 3:2024cv01366
Defendant:
William Rodrguez-Bonet, Hector Santos and Cooperativa de Seguros Mutiples de Puerto Rico
Plaintiff:
Xiomara Cubero-Santiago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01742
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1255 Immigration: Failure USCIS To Adjudicate Permanent Residency Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02525
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Moreno Hinostroza, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2783
Petitioner:
KARINA MORENO HINOSTROZA, FABIOLA NAOMI CANCHAYA MORENO and DAYLIN XIOMARA CANCHAYA MORENO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Mata Castillo v. Garland
as 24-60154
Petitioner:
Ofelia Mata Castillo, Keyri Michelle Sorto Mata and Xiomara Cristal Sorto Mata
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Caballero-Romero v. Garland
as 24-60151
Petitioner:
Xiomara Caballero-Romero and Kerstin Xiomara Lopez-Caballero
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Velasco-Andrade, et al. v. Garland
as 23-4296
Petitioner:
CRISTINA XIOMARA VELASCO-ANDRADE and MARIA GUADALUPE IRAHETA-VELASCO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Larios v. Garland
as 23-2087
Petitioner:
IRIS XIOMARA LARIOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
